I will admit, I'm not hugely impressed with the few Tarkovsky films that I've seen, but as a film aficionado I'm delighted to say that this is very atmospheric and thought provoking. Definitely deserving of a title like 'The Soviet Union's response to 2001: A Space Odyssey'. Not for the casual viewer, but a true cinema lover should definitely take a look.
A classic of Soviet cinema, this is a film for all those who enjoy 'soft' science fiction. Set entirely in outer space, this is a film which sees a set of cosmonauts exposed to various delusions and their capacity to deal with the problem of their own psyches gone mad. A fairly slow film for those who like modern special effects, this is a film as much in the genre of drama as science fiction.
outstanding, ponderous, challenging, asking us to consider the moral vs scientific of contact.... also excellent interview with lead actress
Tarkovsky's Solyaris is philosophically focussed on the nature of human existence and where we may end up, while many have compared it to Stanley Kubrick's 2001, which is far more introspective and focuses primarily on humanity's origins. In spite of the intriguing subject matter, both films evoke a simlarly stilted, slow tempo.
The dialogue (from Stanislaw Lem's novel) and the performances convincing, but leave very little character development -- probably by design. *(note: the english-dubbed soundtrack on this release switches randomly and frequently from russian-to-english, for no clear reason, it's best to use the russian audio with subtitles)
The first quarter is set in 1970's Russia and Tokyo, only the cars look out of place in this future. The film then switches to trademark cardboard sets for the remainder.
Smooth cinematography, restrained cut-scenes (bearing in mind the absence of visual effects in the 70s), and stylish composition worthy of Godrey Reggio throughout make up to some degree for the deficiencies.
The editing is one area most left wanting -- Solyaris being three hours and stands as the only DVD I've seen with an intermission!
Fascinating but slow. The American version is no more than a remake of the film and neither gets across the book's core idea. Best to read the book first.
A classic phychological sci-fi!
Possibly inspired by Kubrick's 2001, this is a love story cloaked in a sci-fi plot. Epic in the true sense of the word, a fascinating exploration of reality & creations of the mind, which poses lots of questions & refuses to answer them. Extremely languid in pace, this will test the patience of those brought up on a diet of 90 minutes sci-fi action flicks.
Glad no to live in Russia. They have a different sense of humor from us in the western world.
Fantastic concepts and ideas explored in this story, but slow. If your intersted in history of Sci-fi films then it's great!
Otherwise the more modern US version (starring George Clooney?) is probably more exciting for most viewers(and shorter!)
Fasinating film. Definitely the kind of film some will hate/love. If your a casual film watcher, I would recommend you watch Steven Soderbergh version of Solaris first. I actually prefer Solderbergh's version, I thought it was more haunting.
While 2001: A Space Odyssey largely explored the question of "Where do we come from?", this Russian movie explored the question of "Who are we?". Unfortunately Solaris doesn't quite bring it of in the way 2001 did with its journey. A bit too long, slow and ponderous (and with average special effects)it seems to lack the meditative depth and insight Tarkovsky brought to his later great movie The Mirror.
see the recent remake or read the book instead
I'm sorry but who has the time for 2 discs of painfully slow viewing as the Russian cast go through their motions - other than film students? The modern George Clooney version was much more compelling, without sacrificing this interesting and unsettling tale.