Monsters (2010)

Monsters
JOIN NOW

Coarse language and science fiction themes

Director: Gareth Edwards
Actors: Scoot Mcnairy, Whitney Able

Six years ago a NASA space probe crashed to earth with a shipload of alien stowaways on board - in the time since, a massive section of the Mexico-US boarder has been fenced off and is now quarantined as an 'infected zone'. Today, the American and Mexican military still struggle to contain "the creatures"... Photojournalist Andrew (Scoot McNairy) is keen to get pictures of the creatures, but when he's tasked with getting his boss's daughter (Whitney Able) back to the US, a one-day trip turns into a surprising journey. Not your average sci-fi monster movie, Monsters is instead a one-of-a-kind hybrid, a cross genre road movie love-story that just happens to travel into the heart of an alien-infested war zone.

DVD
Status: QuickPick
Run time: 90mins
Origin: UNITED KINGDOM
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Budget beasties
by Simon Miraudo,

I’d sooner believe director Gareth Edwards had hired actual extra-terrestrials to make an appearance in his film Monsters, than accept the fact that he was able to construct them with his SFX-savvy and a measly budget of $500,000. Do you know how much $500,000 gets you in a typical Hollywood movie? You could pay for the first few minutes of Iron Man 2, or perhaps the first sixth of Paranormal Activity 2 (although I suspect much of that film’s $3 million budget went into the pockets of producers). Edwards, tallying up a bill the equivalent of one Hollywood executive’s evening at The Ivy, has created something magical. Monsters is an alien invasion movie that feels real and true, and that’s only partly thanks to the spectacular D.I.Y. special-effects. It’s anchored by two lead performances f...

I’d sooner believe director Gareth Edwards had hired actual extra-terrestrials to make an appearance in his film Monsters, than accept the fact that he was able to construct them with his SFX-savvy and a measly budget of $500,000. Do you know how much $500,000 gets you in a typical Hollywood movie? You could pay for the first few minutes of Iron Man 2, or perhaps the first sixth of Paranormal Activity 2 (although I suspect much of that film’s $3 million budget went into the pockets of producers). Edwards, tallying up a bill the equivalent of one Hollywood executive’s evening at The Ivy, has created something magical. Monsters is an alien invasion movie that feels real and true, and that’s only partly thanks to the spectacular D.I.Y. special-effects. It’s anchored by two lead performances from Scoot McNairy and Whitney Able, who turn a post-apocalyptic road movie into an affecting romantic drama. It is the second movie arriving in Australian cinemas this week (Gasland is the other) to succeed where Eat Pray Love failed. Monsters is a believable journey of self-discovery. And it was made for the price of Eat Pray Love’s catering budget.

The film takes place in the ‘not too distant future’ (and as all sci-fi fans know, this vague period of time is often depicted as a hellscape of unimaginable terror). Aliens have arrived on Earth; specifically, on the border between Mexico and the United States. (What is the deal with aliens always invading politically incendiary locations? As if there wasn’t already enough tension between the U.S. and Mexico regarding their oft-crossed perimeter. At least these intergalactic life forms were wise enough to stay away from South Africa. But I digress.) The space invaders are gargantuan, electrified, jellyfish-esque monstrosities that stalk the land. They use their tentacles to tear cars in two and feast on the human treats inside. Understandably, the beasts have been quarantined to an area in Mexico known as the Infected Zone. But if Mexican immigrants were already risking their lives to illegally enter America, they’ve got plenty more reason to now that the monsters have turned their nation into a land of post-apocalyptic ruin.

McNairy stars as Andrew Kaulder, a photo-journalist eager to capture the terrifying realities of alien-torn Mexico on his camera. Not because it’s important for the historical record, but because his newspaper pays more for a picture of a dead child than a smiling one. Kaulder’s selfish-sojourn is interrupted when his powerful employer charges him with an important task: find his daughter Samantha (Able) and bring her home to America. Samantha and Kaulder hit it off fairly quickly, and a ferry is organised to help her cross the border. Of course, when their passports and tickets are snatched, they have no choice but to venture through the Infected Zone to find their way home. Obviously, it’s a terrible idea.

You’ll have no doubt picked up on the similarities between Monsters and other recent alien-invasion flicks such as Cloverfield (which was more of a rollicking action film) and District 9 (which was more of a social satire). Although Monsters has a fair number of intense moments, and makes a few fleeting comments on the immigration issue raging between the U.S. and Mexico, Edwards is more concerned with fleshing out the love-story between Kaulder and Samantha. It feels genuine; their friendship, their kinship, the moments and experiences they share. I wasn’t surprised to learn that McNairy and Able are married in real life. Credit must be offered to ingenious writer/director Edwards, who shot the film without location permissions and used a computer program to throw in the special effects after the fact. Monsters is a true spectacle, from its unsettling opening scene to its tremendous, awe-inspiring finale. And thrifty!

4/5

Check out Simon's other reviews here.

Read More

Member Reviews (46)

46 Member Reviews
Margaret
says
What to say about this movie.Well it wasn't suppose to be a thriller and it wasn't.I thought the octopus being the so called monster was a bit stupid.I enjoyed the movie up until it started to be a bit non plus closer to the end not recommended.
Posted Saturday, 1 June 2013 See my other reviews
says
As a fan of sci-fi, this one wasn't too bad. It starts off slow and sort of builds up to seeing the 'creatures' clearly towards the end. The death and killing is more implied than seeing blood and gore. Shaking camera filming is not my fav but it is tolerable. The main actor is a bit of a douche in how he hits on the girl he is trying to get out of the infected zone. She is very pretty but her acting is very minimal. I have seen a lot worse films. If you like your suspence built slowly, this movie is for you if you like mediocre sci-fi.
Posted Thursday, 4 April 2013 See my other reviews
Pig McGee
says
If you look into how this film was made, you'd be shocked. They literally just travelled through Mexico and Belize (and somewhere else) and filmed randomly with a hand-held camera. For the budget spent, this is an amazing movie -written, directed and shot by one man! Most of the people in this movie were not even actors. The two scenes with the ferry ticketmaster are amazing, considering they met him 10 minutes before they shot them! I wondered why the actors seemed so real - well it was because they were! Great movie, highly recommended. I loved the fact that it was British and so non-hollywood. And I am a sci-fi buff.
Posted Wednesday, 20 March 2013 See my other reviews
sue
says
It is unusual in a good way.
Posted Tuesday, 12 February 2013 See my other reviews
Tiffany
says
I actually enjoyed this film. Who would have thought an alien movie would have an adventure and love story involved. Dont know why the title was called Monsters, it was more a real life, I want out sort of situation movie. Ending left you guessing and I was hoping for a happy ever after ending. If you want Scifi dont get it, if you want a love story then yes I would recommend it.
Posted Monday, 11 February 2013 See my other reviews
Princess Toadstool
says
limited story line - shocking
Posted Sunday, 6 January 2013 See my other reviews
Lyndi
says
Utterly puerile - not worth watching
Posted Friday, 9 November 2012 See my other reviews
Le goret
says
If this is the best that sci-fi has to offer, then God please help the rest of us...
Posted Thursday, 1 November 2012 See my other reviews
Terry
says
Abysmal, this is not really worth watching. The "monsters" were giant 1950's type walking octopuses of which you see very little. Lots of talking and looking around, nothing really happens. I have given it one star for the acting and the scenery.
Posted Thursday, 28 June 2012 See my other reviews
Nigel W
says
A journalist is ordered by his boss to rescue his daughter from nasty aliens. A sci-fi action movie that shoots above its weight. The journey through the alien infested no man’s land is quite effective given the low budget. 3.5 stars
Posted Thursday, 14 June 2012 See my other reviews
Stephen
says
A bit slow moving.
Posted Wednesday, 4 April 2012 See my other reviews
rob
says
Shot in a documentary fashion with a laboured unfolding of events and an ending that well left you flat.
Posted Friday, 16 March 2012 See my other reviews
Howard Morgan
says
What a load of old crock. Under-acted, unbelievable characters, Monsters, what monsters, whoever conceived this load of rubbish never saw any of the classic monster movies and took the financiers to the cleaners.
Posted Monday, 30 January 2012 See my other reviews
jen
says
not my cup of tea.
Posted Saturday, 28 January 2012 See my other reviews
Julie Lotz
says
I didn't mind this movie. Found it reasonably interesting. The movie was made on a shoestring budget so I really don't think they did too bad a job of it. Seen a lot worse.
Posted Monday, 23 January 2012 See my other reviews
Paul
says
One of the more original movies for a while although the title is a little misleading.
Posted Saturday, 21 January 2012 See my other reviews
Vanessa
says
I still have no idea what this was trying to say or do and left me with a What The? feeling. At lest the gore was kept to a minimum.
Posted Saturday, 7 January 2012 See my other reviews
Ian
says
Very slow moving, not enough action and bad love story. Had potential but didnt live up to the name.
Posted Wednesday, 4 January 2012 See my other reviews
Elspethn
says
Not bad - I enjoyed it as I watched it but expected a 'surprise' or development at the end which didn't arrive.
Posted Thursday, 8 December 2011 See my other reviews
Chris
says
Nauseating. That's the one word to sum up political garbage like this movie. When I want to watch a movie titled "Monsters", I want to watch a movie about, well, about monsters. I want action and suspense. Yet when I want to learn about the subtleties of the real world and its politics, then I read a variety of books, periodicals, articles, and opinion pieces written from different perspectives. But to be superficial and spew out the same cliche -- "Evil America" -- that the unthinking mainstream media now embraces is, frankly, BORING. It' been done. It's stale. And few people are stupid enough to believe this slogan. For example, in one scene, we find out that there are no "real" monsters: they are the creation of the United States. Yes, that's right. There are no real monsters in life. It's all the United States' fault for bombing the "goodness" out of them. Good ol' US of A sends in its warplanes and then, in response to this hostile act, the monsters are created. So simple. Didn't you know? And if you don't think it's that simple, that it's all the United States' fault, then you are a troglodyte, sir. My good man, get enlightened! Everyone and everything is born good and it's only the actions of the powerful, of the United States, that corrupts nature's goodness. What a load of trash. But it's the ending that really left me retching. To solve the monster problem the United States has built a giant wall to quarantine itself from all those horrible undesirables crossing the border to the south. Oh, spare me. The United States is so broke, so indebted that it's lucky if it can build a 20-metre bridge -- forget about building a 200-m high wall that runs for hundreds of kilometres. It's more than ten years since 9/11, and the States haven't even started construction on the Twin Towers' replacement. I guess the scriptwriter had more than one meaning with the giant, segregating wall. Israel come to mind? So glib. Action: all the action is in the first minute. Dialogue: that word "nauseating" comes to mind, again. It's cheap, stupid, sentimental balderdash. The male protagonist: he's the sort of dweeb that chimps at the zoo will single out to fling their waste at. The "monsters": real or not, they weren't scary or nasty. Actually, I had a hankering for fried calamari rings while watching this movie. So, to sum up this movie (besides nauseating) I will use a word I'm sure the activist director and activist scriptwriter are familiar with: BOYCOTT.
Posted Wednesday, 30 November 2011 See my other reviews
Lisa
says
mmm, different. Glad I watched the extras on the director's vision - helped me to understand his thinking behind the movie. There was some really lovely scenery within the movie.
Posted Tuesday, 22 November 2011 See my other reviews
Russell
says
Monsters proves that you don't need $200 million and non-stop explosions to make a quality science fiction movie ... using an intelligent and subtle script with engaging characters. There is a great deal of suspense - largely driven by character development and fear of the unknown rather than shock moments on screen. The film is beautifully shot, making the most of the exotic locations and minimising special effects. The two main actors give really grounded performances that drive the picture. Highly recommended.... just don't expect this to be like District 9 or The Thing!
Posted Tuesday, 25 October 2011 See my other reviews
Simon S.
says
One of the best films for acting, locations and concept since Cloverfield! The suspense comes from what's NOT seen as opposed to what is put on the screen. McNairy and Able work well together and not just because they are a couple in real life. Watching the DVD extras gives a good behind the scenes look into the directors vision and how the whole film was constructed. I'll definetely be looking out for Gareth Edwards films' in the future...
Posted Sunday, 11 September 2011 See my other reviews
Shell
says
Worse than Cloverfield (which is really crap too by the way)
Posted Friday, 9 September 2011 See my other reviews
Dai-Wei
says
I saw this film at the Internation Film Festival on closing night and although visually, it was a treat, this film was overall disappointing. The actors had no chemistry EVEN THOUGH they are a couple in real life, which was bizarre to find out. Although science fiction, this film is devoid of action, mystery, logic and meaning. I understood that this wasn't a typical "Independence Day" alienfest but still I was left yearning SOME kind of structure. What could have been an adventurous journey with a developing meaningful relationship and undertones of cultural differences turned out to be a superficial arthouse sci-fi wank. This film had too many opportunities to give the audience insight into both characters and revealing an ominous sense of cosmicism and our hypocritical view on importance as a species. In the end, there was nothing in this film albeit two strangers conveniently walking from Mexico to America and they see an octopus. H.P. Lovecraft would be turning in his grave. P.S.- If this was a SHORT film, then maybe it would've achieved it's goal. This movie was filmed well considering how small the crew were but plot, script and heart was incredibly lacking.
Posted Saturday, 13 August 2011 See my other reviews
Ben H
says
Boring. Giant octopus don't cut it as scary aliens, and they were rarely seen. Just a lot of bad acting, and not much storyline.
Posted Sunday, 31 July 2011 See my other reviews
kimbo
says
Six years after Earth has suffered an alien invasion a cynical journalist agrees to escort a shaken American tourist through an infected zone in Mexico to the safety of the US border. Enjoyable but the ending sucked!
Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 See my other reviews
Mintiegirl
says
This one snuck up on me - but I really enjoyed the concept. You saw glimpses, but enough of the monsters to become fascinated by the story and the plight of the individuals involved.
Posted Saturday, 23 July 2011 See my other reviews
bugscuz
says
Hmm...it was the atmosphere that got this movie the 5 stars. I like alien movies and monster movies. The plot was very wavy through the whole movie and I seriously expected something better than a giant glow-in-the-dark octopus for the monsters...the end was a laugh for me, I think it was meant to be tense and fraught with suspense but after seeing the giant octopuses [octopi?] I just couldn't take it seriously any more. The dead kid was a bit sad, I would have liked it to be more clear on whether or not he took the photo like he said he would at the start of the movie. Bit long winded but I did enjoy it
Posted Thursday, 30 June 2011 See my other reviews
Matthew B.
says
Very different but intriguing and enjoyable twist on the story of earth being invaded by extraterrestrials.
Posted Wednesday, 1 June 2011 See my other reviews
covoo
says
was so disappointed in this movie,for me it was a one time watch,the best part for me was the ending at the service station.
Posted Tuesday, 31 May 2011 See my other reviews
Paul
says
Don't expect this to be 'District 9' and you'll be okay. Although it is technically a sci-fi movie, it is really just a road-movie that focusses on the journey and the relationship between the two main characters. In other words it's sci-fi meets chick-flick.
Posted Tuesday, 31 May 2011 See my other reviews
Loonie
says
Don't bother. Bad story, bad acting, silly monsters.
Posted Monday, 30 May 2011 See my other reviews
Liz C
says
I can't believe all these people saying how boring blah blah blah this movie was. I guess they were expecting some Independence Day style patriotic rubbish. The whole point of the movie was 'aliens'. Being Alien. It was very cleverly set on the Mexican/American border. A border notorious for people trying to sneak illegally through. Just as District 9 did, this movie is saying how all creatures deserve to live somewhere in peace, even alien creatures. Beautifully shot, great script and the actors were very natural. The ending was brilliant!
Posted Sunday, 29 May 2011 See my other reviews
T.Burton
says
Hmm what can i say. watched the complete movie hoping that something was going to happen. very dissapointed with this one.
Posted Thursday, 26 May 2011 See my other reviews
Tracy
says
This is so NOT a monster movie. It has no real storyline and is just plain boring.
Posted Wednesday, 25 May 2011 See my other reviews
Andrew
says
Worst movie ever !
Posted Thursday, 19 May 2011 See my other reviews
joffa
says
this is not a good movie, boring........waiting for something to happen,
Posted Friday, 13 May 2011 See my other reviews
stewart
says
does not deserve any starts. just remove it from the library
Posted Tuesday, 10 May 2011 See my other reviews
Rob
says
boring and a complete waste of time. do yourself a favour and watch something else. just about anything would be better then this garbage.
Posted Tuesday, 10 May 2011 See my other reviews
Michael
says
In the words of Comic Book Guy from The Simpsons,"Worst Movie Ever!"
Posted Monday, 9 May 2011 See my other reviews
EAM
says
Boring, pointless, garbage. Don't waste your time!
Posted Monday, 9 May 2011 See my other reviews
Max
says
A limp attempt at social commentary mixed with apathetic acting, very little action and some very poor attempts at suspense, this is a disappointing movie.
Posted Saturday, 7 May 2011 See my other reviews
~Z~
says
Don't waste your time with this movie,90 minutes of bordem.It was more like a documentry about mexico.the entire movie was just two people crossing the country looking and taking photos of ruined buildings.only saw two aliens at the end of the movie.......no action,story line or anything remotely interesting....I've give it a 1.2 out of 10.
Posted Sunday, 1 May 2011 See my other reviews
lance
says
for an action/drama film there wasnt really any action but plenty of drama. the alien monsters looked undesirable and all in all a dissapointing flick and i rated it 4 outta 10
Posted Saturday, 30 April 2011 See my other reviews
Janice
says
Really disappointing as a modern Sci Fi. Earth probe crash lands back in Mexico, carrying samples that contain life forms. Scientists do nothing but let them grow and multiply and kill! Solution, build a huge wall around America to keep them out. Acting was poor, as was the special effects. Storyline lacked suspense.
Posted Wednesday, 20 April 2011 See my other reviews