Midnight in Paris (2011)

Midnight in Paris
JOIN NOW

Mild sexual references

Director: Woody Allen
Actors: Owen Wilson, Rachel McAdams, Michael Sheen, Marion Cotillard, Alison Pill, Tom Hiddleston, Mimi Kennedy, Kurt Fuller, Carla Bruni, Kathy Bates, Lea Seydoux, Adrien Brody, Corey Stoll

On holidays in Paris with his fiancé, Gil, a successful Hollywood screenwriter and self-confessed nostalgist, harbours the dream of someday writing a great American novel. He’s besotted with the golden age of Paris of the 1920s, and the legends of Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Picasso, Dali… Exploring the city, Gil embarks on an enchanted journey to discover the streets alive with hidden wonders that will change his life forever. Featuring Owen Wilson, Rachel McAdams, Kathy Bates, Michael Sheen, Marion Cotillard and Adrien Brody, Midnight In Paris is an exhilarating valentine to the City of Light, and a sheer pleasure to watch – beguiling, magical, thoughtful and very funny, and a paean to dreamers and romantics everywhere.

DVD
Status: QuickPick
Run time: 94mins
Origin: UNITED STATES
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
by Simon Miraudo, 18/10/2011 11:02:00 AM

Cynical world that this is, we often think an artist’s best work is behind them. Woody Allen is not exempt; his golden age is almost universally agreed to be the 1970s, when he balanced riotous sex comedies with touching dramedies. Of course, saying the man reached his pinnacle almost forty years ago does a disservice to his work of the 80s (Zelig, Hannah and Her Sisters), 90s (Husbands and Wives, Bullets over Broadway) and 2000s (Match Point, Vicky Cristina Barcelona), but criticism is a reflective and retrospective game. It’s impossible to imagine future works, and difficult to understand the cultural effect something new will have over the next few years. No matter how great the auteur, we’re hesitant to attribute ‘classic’ status to their latest creation, lest we be made a fool once th...

Cynical world that this is, we often think an artist’s best work is behind them. Woody Allen is not exempt; his golden age is almost universally agreed to be the 1970s, when he balanced riotous sex comedies with touching dramedies. Of course, saying the man reached his pinnacle almost forty years ago does a disservice to his work of the 80s (Zelig, Hannah and Her Sisters), 90s (Husbands and Wives, Bullets over Broadway) and 2000s (Match Point, Vicky Cristina Barcelona), but criticism is a reflective and retrospective game. It’s impossible to imagine future works, and difficult to understand the cultural effect something new will have over the next few years. No matter how great the auteur, we’re hesitant to attribute ‘classic’ status to their latest creation, lest we be made a fool once the dust has settled and time has proven it to be merely a trifle.

This is the struggle faced by reviewers who willingly submit themselves to Allen’s buoyant Midnight in Paris, which is as fun and sumptuous as any picture he’s ever made. It’s also the struggle faced by Allen, who, in the form of his lead character/avatar Gil (Owen Wilson), seems to admit his recent work hasn’t been up to snuff, and whose esteem is crushed by the constant comparisons to past greats. Gil is a hack Hollywood screenwriter who hates his day job, is trying to complete his first novel, and yearns for the days of F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway. Whilst on holiday in France with his fiancée (Rachel McAdams) and her tea-party parents (Kurt Fuller and Mimi Kennedy), he wistfully recalls the rose-tinted and roaring ‘20s of his imagination. It was a time when poets, painters, authors, models and filmmakers coalesced in gay Paris to create some of the finest pieces of art in modern history. The closest he thinks he’ll ever get is by writing a book about ‘nostalgia’, and having the meaning of these artistic works relayed to him by his fiancé’s smug former lover (Michael Sheen), who has imposed himself as their tour guide. C’est la vie.

Magic strikes when Gil takes a late night stroll on his lonesome, tipsy on wine and finally free of his buzz-killing family. When the clock strikes twelve, a town car pulls up and escorts him back to the era of his fantasies. Awe-struck Gil is finally confronted by his heroes: F. Scott (Tom Hiddleston) and Zelda Fitzgerald (Alison Pill), Hemingway (Corey Stoll), Gertrude Stein (Kathy Bates), Pablo Picasso (Marcial Di Fonzo Bo), Salvador Dali (Adrien Brody) and countless others. Most alluring is muse Adriana (Marion Cotillard), who, like Gil, can’t see the forest for the trees, and is so bored by her present company she yearns to experience the late 19th century; the Belle Époque.

Allen repeatedly deploys the same trick - Gil meets someone, then, upon realising their famous identity, exclaims, 'You're so and so?!' - but it's an effective one. It could easily have become tiresome; Wilson sells it with his wide-eyed and restrained enthusiasm. He doesn’t mug as Allen’s placeholder, yet he seems a perfect fit to deliver his wonderfully bewildered barbs. Wilson is also aided by supporting performers who never submit to lazy parody of their subjects. Best of all is Stoll as Hemingway, who delivers one of the most charming and peculiar turns of the year.

There is more to Midnight in Paris than idle idol worship. It romanticises the musings of a daydreamer who spends too much time inside their own head (whilst also having the foresight to admit it’s probably not a conducive or productive way to get work done). Beguiling, bewitching, enchanting, enthralling; Woody Allen has offered us a glimpse into his imagination, exorcised some (rather amiable) demons and shared with us one of the frothiest, funniest and most heart-warming films in years. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong in the near future, but it’s hard to care at this moment. Let’s live in the now, just this once.

4.5/5

Check out Simon’s other reviews here.

Read More

Member Reviews (86)

86 Member Reviews
Trinx
says
Great fun with time shifting and literature. Keanu is fantastic as Papa. Classic Woody Allen.
Posted Monday, 13 May 2013 See my other reviews
says
We thoroughly enjoyed this non-thinker of a film set in Paris. If you're in the mood for something light and cute, this is it. Otherwise, steer clear. It's just a bit of fun!
Posted Friday, 15 March 2013 See my other reviews
jennie
says
One of my fantasies is to be able to step into another time, look around, talk to the people and experience that time as it was so this film really appealed to me. I wish we were really able to do that. Interesting characters too and it revived my interest in surrealist art.- Man Ray - very interesting. A good way to spend an hour and a half.
Posted Wednesday, 27 February 2013 See my other reviews
Kylie S.
says
Hired to watch Rachel and Owen reunite after 'Wedding Crasher' - though he seemed out of depth...even trying too hard with this character. Absolutely goregous photography of Paris! Seemed slow moving in parts....though Rachel is always great; it seems the director did her a diservice by casting her in this C-grade role. Was always waiting for her to deliver more. Give it up Woody!
Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 See my other reviews
says
Quite enjoyable, although lightweight. Slightly unusual storyline, and loved the intro pictures of Paris
Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 See my other reviews
lynne
says
easy to watch and a light lesson on literature and arts history a pleasant film
Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 See my other reviews
jumbuck
says
Pitifully tame... it's about time Woody Allen retired... he's just 'trading on his name' instead of putting out incisive comedy... we haven't had anything decent from him in ages - the stars are for Paris!
Posted Friday, 1 February 2013 See my other reviews
Greg
says
A slight and ultimately empty and trivial film. A pity, because there is potential in the scenes from the 20so, however it is also trite and predictable.
Posted Friday, 11 January 2013 See my other reviews
Sarah & Greg
says
A lovely little movie, best if you have some familiarity with mid 20th century writers and artists. Basically a coming of age, coming to understand yourself movie, but done with great affection and gentleness, and very beautiful to look at, being Paris and all!
Posted Thursday, 6 December 2012 See my other reviews
says
The usual pretentious drivel we have come to expect from Woody Allen as he has aged. Very pretty with some nice pics of Paris (always a gorgeous city) but overall rubbish & a downright silly story - going back to the 1920s? Puleeze! I only ordered it to see Kathy Bates, always a great & versatile actress, but her part was small, she must have needed the money to pay some bills. I felt no empathy with the characters, the finance was a whining woman & the "hero" a dill & a loser. Whatever they were on, I don't want any. Don't bother.
Posted Friday, 9 November 2012 See my other reviews
says
Average movie. Paris looks nice
Posted Sunday, 4 November 2012 See my other reviews
Zel
says
Only for Woody Allen lovers.
Posted Monday, 29 October 2012 See my other reviews
says
very woody allen - interesting concept - well acted
Posted Saturday, 27 October 2012 See my other reviews
Ben Freeman
says
I began watching this film without having seen any previews or knowing anything about the plot and was very quickly taken in by the beauty of it. The story was simple but well cast and well directed. It still had me wondering which way he would decide to go at the end. His present friends and family were annoying, but they were meant to be. Pleasant to watch.
Posted Friday, 12 October 2012 See my other reviews
Nigel W
says
An engaged couple’s romantic trip to Paris turns into a back in time fantasy for the male partner. Another whimsical offering from Woody Allen that treads familiar territory and in the end is quite forgettable.
Posted Saturday, 6 October 2012 See my other reviews
Peter
says
The typical American movie of today has lost, perhaps even doesn't care, what this movie has to offer. Like many Woody Allen movies it is the inner dialogue of people trying to find happiness, could it be a belief in some normality, and what they have to discover for themselves. These films will survive, while 99% of American movies will be seen as commercial nonsense of their day.
Posted Sunday, 30 September 2012 See my other reviews
Fuzzii
says
What a clever movie. I enjoyed this from start to finish and from start to finish again. Easy watching, with an intelligent twist that made for warm humorous entertainment. Who needs an excessive budget when there is a clever plot? Thought provoking and insightful observations of human nature. What makes us feel unique is often what makes us all the same.
Posted Friday, 21 September 2012 See my other reviews
Andre
says
The movie was good but the qualities were quite bad.
Posted Friday, 21 September 2012 See my other reviews
Wayne
says
Absolute rubbish. Poke yourself in the eye with a sharp stick, it's less painful.
Posted Thursday, 20 September 2012 See my other reviews
Di Possee
says
very boring
Posted Tuesday, 18 September 2012 See my other reviews
garrett
says
Interesting premise, but found it a bit boring after a while
Posted Monday, 17 September 2012 See my other reviews
Shah
says
The WORST movie I have seen in ages... BORING and baseless, Couldn't even finish half movie.
Posted Thursday, 13 September 2012 See my other reviews
juliekym
says
Love Owen Wilson in this as it suited his persona and I feel a lot of movies he does don't really gel with him. Woody Allen really sets the mood at the beginning of the feeling of Paris and how it would make you want to go there. We really enjoyed this. A nice movie.
Posted Wednesday, 12 September 2012 See my other reviews
says
loved it!!
Posted Saturday, 8 September 2012 See my other reviews
D.M.
says
A friend suggested I see this film because he knew that I would like it and I did. Part comedy, part whimsy but really interesting, particually if one is at all interested in the artists that are featured in the storyline. The last time I liked Wilson in a role was in "Zoolander" and I haven't really liked his movies much since, but this one suited his lay-back temperament very well. I particularly found Gil's relationship to Inez very interesting, for it was through the story that Gil discovers what he might really want from a relationship and Woody Allen is able to illuminate all sorts of things in his breezy directing style. Liked it very much.
Posted Friday, 31 August 2012 See my other reviews
Sandy
says
A very unusual role from Owen Wilson. Quite bored after about half an hour & stopped watching half way through.
Posted Monday, 27 August 2012 See my other reviews
Bruce
says
The first five minutes made me want to go back to Paris. The next hour and twenty five minutes was pretentious twaddle. Too "try-hard" clever by half.
Posted Monday, 20 August 2012 See my other reviews
Kaz
says
This was a weak and very uninteresting movie. The only saving grace was the backdrop of Paris. It can hardly be called a "comedy".
Posted Wednesday, 15 August 2012 See my other reviews
Doncasimodo
says
How can you not fall in love with Paris under that light? Beautifully scripted...
Posted Tuesday, 7 August 2012 See my other reviews
spotlight
says
My partner and I are no Woody Allen fans - but we laughed out loud a few times watching this gentle, lighthearted comedy. Not for the 'cultural philistines' as there are heaps of references to artists and painters from the early to mid 20th century.
Posted Thursday, 2 August 2012 See my other reviews
Mark
says
Absolutely loved it.
Posted Wednesday, 1 August 2012 See my other reviews
Jill
says
Boring
Posted Sunday, 22 July 2012 See my other reviews
Jean
says
Excellent,funny,romantic,uplifting,film.Really put me in a good mood. Should be more of it. Films are meant to entertain & this certainly does.
Posted Monday, 16 July 2012 See my other reviews
Heather
says
Boring
Posted Friday, 13 July 2012 See my other reviews
kimbo
says
A family travel to the French capital for business. The party includes a young engaged couple who are forced to confront their differing views of a perfect life. Very enjoyable fantasy. Owen Wilson is marrying into the family from hell. Woody Allen comes up with a script and story to save this poor soul
Posted Sunday, 8 July 2012 See my other reviews
Tony C.
says
Vastly over-rated despite advertising much. Poor choice of leading actor and after viewing- left feeling - "is that it ?"
Posted Sunday, 8 July 2012 See my other reviews
Marg
says
this movie was very average with an ending leaving you saying, that's it!
Posted Monday, 2 July 2012 See my other reviews
Binni
says
Worst movie I've seen for ages.
Posted Saturday, 30 June 2012 See my other reviews
stuart
says
loved it!
Posted Tuesday, 26 June 2012 See my other reviews
Marg
says
Loved this movie with a really different storyline. Could easily watch it again - especially the lovely scenery of Paris.
Posted Tuesday, 26 June 2012 See my other reviews
Shep
says
Oh Paris, in the sun or the rain, you are lovely. This is one of the few movies I actually bothered to see at a cinema and i'm glad I did. And i'm glad I watched it again because it is just a lovely, funny, romantic movie. Rose coloured glasses, are they really such a bad thing?
Posted Saturday, 23 June 2012 See my other reviews
Walker
says
Great movie. Fun, romantic and a bit silly. Now I want to go back to Paris
Posted Saturday, 16 June 2012 See my other reviews
Ditch
says
Fantastic! The PERFECT film.
Posted Friday, 15 June 2012 See my other reviews
GK
says
A movie with great scenery and a unique storyline. True that we are always seeking and looking for better.
Posted Wednesday, 13 June 2012 See my other reviews
Robert L. Hill
says
Charming, inventive, intelligent and fun. Woody Allen.
Posted Tuesday, 12 June 2012 See my other reviews
Purplesue
says
Brilliant!!! Loved it from the opening schene(s) of Paris right through to the very end. My type of movie, no violence, swearing or nudity. Allen at his very best. Not screamingly funny by any means, but there were some really great one-liners there that I has real "laugh out loud" reactions to. Don't miss this one!!
Posted Sunday, 10 June 2012 See my other reviews
myself
says
Awesome movie and not a swearword either. finally a movie where no one threw up. 10/10
Posted Sunday, 3 June 2012 See my other reviews
J
says
Brilliant Must see! Escapism @ its utter best!
Posted Tuesday, 29 May 2012 See my other reviews
BB
says
Did not enjoy this at all. Boring.
Posted Tuesday, 29 May 2012 See my other reviews
nicole
says
Very boring and silly.
Posted Monday, 28 May 2012 See my other reviews
Dave
says
excellent....I want to go to Paris
Posted Monday, 28 May 2012 See my other reviews
Tony
says
Perseverence with he first 10-15' will be richly rewarded. This film is a breath of fresh air among modern films. A knowledge and familiarity with Paris helps, particularly the great "art" movement of the 1900s, as you will meet many of the now famous characters. The main character could be Woody Allan himself, with all the attendant anguish and doubts, but he gets our sympathy. How did they ever get engaged? Forget fantasy and enjoy a fairy tale for discerning adults. Worth watching again - and again.
Posted Sunday, 27 May 2012 See my other reviews
Lisa
says
I really enjoyed this - a very different type of movie but thoroughly entertaining - the only downside was the main character - one of the Wilson brothers (possibly Owen) it didnt suit him, it would have been better suited to someone else though strangely that didnt affect my enjoyment of the movie as I was thrilled to see the old 'real life characters such as Salvador Dali, and the artists of that era, etc. What a great idea for a movie.
Posted Wednesday, 23 May 2012 See my other reviews
Grey B
says
I was looking forward to this film and was very disappointed. Cliche after cliche with a saccharin fairytale plot. This rose-tinted view (yellow-tinted in reality) of tourist Paris with a romantic view of its artistic pass somehow remains entertaining. Still recommend a viewing but just keep your expectations low.
Posted Saturday, 19 May 2012 See my other reviews
William C
says
Woody does light fantasy with Paris as a backdrop. Very enjoyable 3.5 for us
Posted Monday, 14 May 2012 See my other reviews
Samantha
says
Worst movie I've ever seen.
Posted Friday, 11 May 2012 See my other reviews
deb
says
fun and entertaining and even a little though provoking
Posted Wednesday, 9 May 2012 See my other reviews
Wizzell
says
Pretty dull acting with horrible holes in the storyline which stretched credibility, some nice scenery in Paris.
Posted Friday, 4 May 2012 See my other reviews
Belinda
says
Delightfully quirky movie. Ernest Hemingway steals the show, with Dali a close second. Thoroughly enjoyed. Great lazy Sunday afternoon movie :)
Posted Thursday, 3 May 2012 See my other reviews
Fabulon
says
Original but disappointing , fell asleep
Posted Wednesday, 2 May 2012 See my other reviews
Paula
says
I loved this movie-much to my surprise- its is sweet and whimiscal and has a gentle, encouraging message about living in the present, not the past.
Posted Saturday, 28 April 2012 See my other reviews
fothogirl
says
Well see I don't know what all the fuss was about -this movie is really boring!
Posted Saturday, 28 April 2012 See my other reviews
Sil
says
A go with the flow type of movie which is good to watch. Couldn't stand the American family though.
Posted Thursday, 26 April 2012 See my other reviews
MLV
says
I had been reluctant to get this movie because I'm just not a fan of Woody Allen films, but this I totally enjoyed. Romantic, feel good, great music and wonderful storyline.
Posted Monday, 23 April 2012 See my other reviews
hb_douglas
says
What a fun movie. Owen Wilson doing Woody Allen - who'd a thunk it. (Woody Allen obviously). The music and Paris are a bonus.
Posted Sunday, 22 April 2012 See my other reviews
Fiend
says
Wonderfully whimsical. Just leave all ratioanlity to one side.
Posted Wednesday, 18 April 2012 See my other reviews
Bushpossum
says
Such a charming mixture of intellect, comedy and whimsy. Beautifully written, Mr Allen rightly won the 2012 Oscar for Best Original Screenplay. Forget realism unless you can explain to me logically how Dorothy survived a hurricane to find hereself in OZ. This is a tale of dreams - the dream of another, better time, a better lover, a better life. Using mostly loving satire Woody gently unearths the foibles inherent in all times and all people, although he reserves his cruelest humor for the contemporary Americans. Might we miss the best of our own time while we dream too much of another? Should we settle for what we have now instead of chasing phantoms? Woody makes it easy for our hero. The phantoms come to him, thrilling and enticing. Perhaps the romance of Hemmingway and Degas is lost, but then again perhaps it can be found now, in Paris, with... You will have to see the movie, and dream your own dreams.
Posted Wednesday, 18 April 2012 See my other reviews
Michelle
says
If you like Woody Allen films but have had enough of Woody Allen playing the lead role - this film is for you. The plot is enjoyable and the time travel scenes are understated (no acceleration to 88mph or flashing lights and explosions), but it helps to have the wikipedia page open while you're watching it because sometimes I got confused as to who the famous authors/film makers/artists were. We all know Picasso and Hemingway, but some of the others were more obscure. I really enjoyed the film and the view of the beautiful city of Paris.
Posted Wednesday, 18 April 2012 See my other reviews
Mandy
says
Lovely travelogue for Paris. Boring storyline.
Posted Friday, 13 April 2012 See my other reviews
Wendy
says
Terrible acting, dreary, disappointing and boring
Posted Friday, 13 April 2012 See my other reviews
Geoff @gol
says
Disappointed could have been great. Typical arthouse Woody Allen has potential for a great storyline but never quite makes it. Time travel movies always difficult as to how they "get there", not much thought put into this one very corny & simple. The real disappointment was the token performance/presence given to the 1920's famous artist the lead character meets, such a waste. Weak romantic plot, Wilson tries hard, support cast displayed basic acting. Paris scenery magnificent. Overall just a fair night's entertainment.
Posted Thursday, 12 April 2012 See my other reviews
le goret
says
The storyline is pleasant, if quite naive, even childish in parts. The acting is terrible though. A disappointment.
Posted Thursday, 12 April 2012 See my other reviews
CB
says
Disappointing movie although enjoyable for the Parisien scenery
Posted Wednesday, 11 April 2012 See my other reviews
Deb
says
Really a bit scatty for my enjoyment.
Posted Wednesday, 11 April 2012 See my other reviews
Neville Carr
says
Was disappointed by latest WA movie. His fundamental longing for a better age is his trademark. Reflects his deep discontentment with life as it is. Was fascinating being drawn into the fantasy world of Hemingway, etc. Left guessing by conclusion - would this relationship, if consummated, answer the key question. Knowing WA, I doubt it!
Posted Wednesday, 11 April 2012 See my other reviews
gerd
says
Somewhat disappointing, simply because it could've been a lot better. Time travel is not uncommon in movies, and here the way the character goes back to the past is well done and repeated every time with twists. But what is never shown is how he gets back from the past to the present; it just seems to happen and is very odd. The scenario also offers great potential for fun on account of knowing the future and bringing back artefacts from the future. The movie exploits that on a few occasions, but not nearly as much as it might have.
Posted Wednesday, 4 April 2012 See my other reviews
Wandella
says
paris was the star in this movie. a beautiful city.
Posted Monday, 2 April 2012 See my other reviews
Su
says
Oh so very dreary! Started out fabulously but even the main character had a drawly Woody Allen voice - not at all appealing. I think this is the last Woody Allen film I'll ever watch. Could they have thrown any more famous artists into the film and all at this wide eyed Owen Wilson. It just went on and on. The star of the film was the City of Paris, beautiful filmed if only the film went on as it started....
Posted Saturday, 31 March 2012 See my other reviews
miss kate
says
If you like Woody Allen and his quirky mannerisms then you will enjoy Owen Wilson in this little gem of a movie. The storyline mixes the past and the present beautifully and the scenery is like a virtual Paris postcard. Enjoy!
Posted Friday, 30 March 2012 See my other reviews
Rita K.
says
What a great film, the Hemingway portrayal is spot on - read 'A Moveable Feast' and you can hear the characters voice narrating it in your head... it's uncanny!! I loved Kathy Bates doing Gertrude Stein too, she's so brilliant. There's nothing not to like about this film... oh by the way, it won the best screenplay oscar at 2012 Academy Awards - well deserved!
Posted Wednesday, 28 March 2012 See my other reviews
Shanna
says
Was worried this would be overrated but I really loved it. Beautiful, funny and enjoyable.
Posted Tuesday, 27 March 2012 See my other reviews
Lisa
says
I am not a fan of Woody Allen however I loved this movie. At the beginning of the movie, I thought that I was not going to like this one. Great movie, excellent cast, loved the story line - brilliant.
Posted Tuesday, 27 March 2012 See my other reviews
morevictorious
says
liked it. I would have to say it is the first movie of Woody Allen's I actually enjoyed. Wilson plays a great part. Good script, great characters. Cheers, Light watching.
Posted Sunday, 25 March 2012 See my other reviews
Belinda
says
Really enjoyed movie
Posted Friday, 23 March 2012 See my other reviews
Liz
says
You would have to have a hard heart not to like this film. Woody Allen has cast Paris in the New York role and shown this city up in the most beautiful light. I've walked across the bridges and the boulevards showcased here and they really do look this fabulous. The intriguing time traveling tale plays second fiddle to showing off Paris though. Owen Wilson really is on career best as Gil Pender (a Woody character if there every was one) trying to write a great novel and getting advice from famous celebrities from Paris in the 20's and Paris in the 1980's. The only let down was the annoying Rachel McAdams who doesn't disappoint. You just want to skip over every scene she is in.
Posted Saturday, 17 March 2012 See my other reviews
Phil
says
Being a fan of Woody Allen, I am always excited when I get to see his new film. First let's talk about Wilson who brilliantly shines in this. Allen and Wilson make a great union and collaboration. The dialogues as always with Allen are a gem. Now what I just didn't get is the storyline. Wilson visits Paris with his in laws and future then every night he is part of the Parisian history, he encounters Hemmingway, Picasso, Dali... And all the celebrities of that "Belle ?poque" period. Who knows how? So here he is Wilson's character is in today's Paris during the day and at night in the past with Lautrec, Fitzgerald... My gosh I found it hard to watch. We all know how Allen's such a weird imagination but for me the story was silly and childish and even Wilson and all the other talents in this movie can't make me forget how stupid that movie was. Allen's got these old ideas about Paris and for sure seeing where he's filmed the French capital looks wonderful. Falling in love with Paris from a 5 star hotel and chauffeured limousine is easy however the reality isn't part of this film. It's all in Allen's imagination!
Posted Tuesday, 13 March 2012 See my other reviews