Martha Marcy May Marlene (2011)

Martha Marcy May Marlene
JOIN NOW

Strong themes and sex scenes

Director: Sean Durkin
Actors: Elizabeth Olsen, John Hawkes, Sarah Paulson, Hugh Dancy, Brady Corbet

Elizabeth Olsen (the captivating younger sister of Mary-Kate and Ashley) plays Martha, a young woman who reunites with older sister Lucy (Sarah Paulson) after she mysteriously escapes from a bucolic commune. Lucy's materialistic husband (Hugh Dancy) and their nouveau riche estate prove suffocating and oppressive, but Martha (whose identity slips between each of the titular names) stays, terrified that the enigmatic leader of the collective (John Hawkes) will track her down.

DVD
Status: QuickPick
Run time: 102mins
Origin: UNITED STATES
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
by Simon Miraudo, 22/07/2011 10:07:00 AM

If Winter’s Bone was just a little too chipper for your liking, perhaps you’d prefer the decidedly darker Martha Marcy May Marlene. Although the plots of these films are rather different (in the former, we deal with meth-cooking Mississippians; in the latter, we meet some creepy sex cultists) there are plenty of similarities between the two projects. Both made buzzy debuts at the Sundance Film Festival; both feature a startlingly excellent central performance from a young - heretofore unknown – actress; both feature terrifying turns from John Hawkes. I sincerely hope that Sean Durkin’s Martha Marcy May Marlene follows in the footsteps of its spiritual sibling, and goes on to collect Oscar nominations for Best Picture, Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor (maybe this time, the overdue Haw...

If Winter’s Bone was just a little too chipper for your liking, perhaps you’d prefer the decidedly darker Martha Marcy May Marlene. Although the plots of these films are rather different (in the former, we deal with meth-cooking Mississippians; in the latter, we meet some creepy sex cultists) there are plenty of similarities between the two projects. Both made buzzy debuts at the Sundance Film Festival; both feature a startlingly excellent central performance from a young - heretofore unknown – actress; both feature terrifying turns from John Hawkes. I sincerely hope that Sean Durkin’s Martha Marcy May Marlene follows in the footsteps of its spiritual sibling, and goes on to collect Oscar nominations for Best Picture, Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor (maybe this time, the overdue Hawkes can actually win it).

That Best Actress contender is Elizabeth Olsen. Yes, she’s sister to Mary Kate and Ashley, but she seems cut from a different cloth entirely. The movie opens with Olsen living in a commune with a number of young women and men, led by Patrick (Hawkes). At this point in the film, her name is Marcy May, and she joins the ladies in preparing food for the fellas, waiting on the staircase for them to finish eating, and then enjoying their meal once the men have been satisfied. They all sleep in a big pile on the floor (and not the cute kind, like in Where the Wild Things Are). Marcy May makes a run for it one morning, and she nervously calls out her estranged sister Lucy (Sarah Paulson) to come rescue her. To Lucy, Marcy May is Martha. She goes with Lucy to live with her and her husband Ted (Hugh Dancy); unwilling, or perhaps unable, to talk about the events that transpired at Patrick’s farmhouse. But as the days pass, Martha/Marcy May’s paranoia grows, and we witness through flashback some of the atrocities committed by Patrick, her co-culters, and herself.

Writer/director Sean Durkin makes a stunning feature film debut here, managing to convey the emotional turmoil within Martha/Marcy May in a truly cinematic way. That may sound like a back-handed compliment, or perhaps even a meaningless one, but Durkin understands how to use cinematic conventions to tell a story effectively. Consider all the lame psychological thrillers that think ‘shattered mirrors’ will suffice in making their pic both scary and meaningful. Durkin knows how to make his camera mimic Martha/Marcy May’s psyche, and similarly position the audience to feel like her, without us even noticing that we are being so expertly manipulated. The pacing of the film itself mirrors her unraveling; the scene transitions become like her dreams; the shot compositions become like her nightmares. As Martha/Marcy May struggles to understand what is real, what is fake, what happened, and what she merely imagined, Durkin offers the audience no respite. The film’s first few relatively calm (but still unsettling) moments are never revisited. Each time we return to Patrick’s commune, we bear witness to gradually more and more horrifying events.

Elizabeth Olsen has three aliases in this film (‘Marlene’ is a creepy one that I won’t spoil); each one representing a different time in her life. She is called upon to be many things: carefree, aloof, abused, hurtful, hurt, unhinged, totally serene, terrified, over-sexed, innocent. Her range is phenomenal, and her performance seems effortless. The same goes for Hawkes, who is not required to display such a range of feeling, but must still make his Patrick go from a comforting presence to a horrifying one with only a few minor emotional calibrations. He never raises his voice and he never chews the scenery. But you can sense him in every scene – even at the seemingly safe house of Lucy and Ted. Martha Marcy May Marlene is a deeply disturbing film about psychological trauma, with some of the finest performances of the year, and a final shot that will stay with you long after the credits roll. Some will call it abrupt. I say the film ends not a second too soon. But that doesn’t mean I’m not curious as to what happens next.

4.5/5

Check out Simon’s other reviews here.

Read More

Member Reviews (24)

24 Member Reviews
says
A wonderful performance by Elizabeth Olsen, she's got a big career ahead of her. While this film is quite slow moving I found myself very drawn into her story. It really shows the emotional manipulation and brainwashing that attracts people to cults and that makes it so hard to leave and integrate into normal society. A lot of people have complained about the ending but I thought it was perfect, it left me with the same tension I felt throughout the film.
Posted Wednesday, 20 March 2013 See my other reviews
Neen123
says
Great film. Elizabeth Olsen is someone to watch.
Posted Saturday, 9 March 2013 See my other reviews
Dave S.
says
This well made, excellently acted thriller follows a traumatised cult victim as she struggles to adapt to a normal life. Flashbacks to her past bleed into the present in a way that disorients and unsettles the viewer. Is she is an unreliable narrator or is her paranoia well founded? Normally I wouldn't end with a question like that, but for this film I felt it was only appropriate. May be frustratingly ambiguous for some, but I found it hugely engaging. The term "slow-burn" definitely applies, which should set off warning bells for anyone expecting a conventionally paced thriller.
Posted Friday, 1 March 2013 See my other reviews
Bruce
says
Dark eerie number with some incredible performances. It's a film that will stay with you long after you've finished watching it. Not one to be watched as a first date or with the parents as there are a few awkward scenes. I'm a big fan of this one.
Posted Tuesday, 15 January 2013 See my other reviews
Allanby
says
Once again a movie whih equates long periods staring at the camera with emotional trauma. Whoever labelled it a 'thriller' must lead a dull life. Slow, at times to the point of being excrutiating, the film meanders between past and present in a confusing way. The ending is unsatisfactory. Why are emotionally disturbed people always swimming?
Posted Tuesday, 4 December 2012 See my other reviews
kimbo
says
I forced myself to sit through 2 hours of flashbacks which were hard to separate from non flashbacks hoping to get an explanation... Perhaps an ending. I got neither....and that was an excruciating two hours. I understand the psychological trauma of abuse and I know this is what the movie revolved around but I did not feel it had a plot even...and definitely no conclusion. It just is not the psychological thriller it was purported to be. It is not a thriller. I can say I hope to see Elizabeth Olsen in a different movie. I think she does have talent and is the reason I didn't just turn it off in the first 15 minutes.
Posted Saturday, 1 December 2012 See my other reviews
Greggo
says
A slow moving suspenseful drama about a girl on the run from a small religious cult. Lots of subtle flashbacks work well pushing the narrative on. Fine understated performances. If you are patient and not expecting any action this film is worth seeing although the ending may disappoint yet in hindsight it seemed quite apt.
Posted Sunday, 25 November 2012 See my other reviews
Babs B
says
I didn't mind this movie, [ these are the type that are deep and make you think about it ] especially the ending........................still thinking a little disappointing. Where as my partner did not enjoy it at all thought it was weird.
Posted Monday, 19 November 2012 See my other reviews
Jane
says
I found this movie very slow, only just kept me interested, and the ending was strange, like the rest of it.
Posted Saturday, 17 November 2012 See my other reviews
paul o
says
If this film went any slower it would stop.A waste of time.
Posted Friday, 2 November 2012 See my other reviews
Art S.
says
Spooky tale of a girl who escapes from a hippie cult (with obvious and direct references to the Manson Family) and the aftermath of her time there (seen in flashback). Generally, the effects of trauma and brainwashing seem realistic (as acted vacantly by Elizabeth Olson) but the yuppie couple (her sister and her husband) who take her in are a bit beyond belief. Genuinely moody and paranoid, if you like that sort of thing (which I do). I believe this is the first directorial outing for Sean Durkin, championed by Sundance.
Posted Wednesday, 17 October 2012 See my other reviews
Nigel W
says
Member of a Charles Manson type cult finds the going tough when she leaves. A film that doesn’t sensationalise the subject by turning it into a horror movie. The tension is created by the fear of being tracked down by the cult. In that way you can never fully escape.
Posted Saturday, 13 October 2012 See my other reviews
janine
says
Like most other people I watched this to see Elizabeth Olsen but honestly, she didn't have that much to do in this movie but sit around looking stunned or simple. The story was interesting and could have been even more interesting with a little more action and a slightly better script. It was well filmed and cast but soooo slow that my attention drifted away and I had to rewind several times in case I had missed something. Worth watching but it won't win any prizes.
Posted Saturday, 22 September 2012 See my other reviews
Bruce
says
Stilted acting. ponderous script, boring direction. 40 minutes was enough
Posted Thursday, 20 September 2012 See my other reviews
Lee
says
Elizabeth Olsen is a great actress, but I found this movie mind numbingly boring and couldn't finish it. Maybe on a very very very very slow day ...
Posted Saturday, 15 September 2012 See my other reviews
CL-D
says
Somerset Maugham' s requirements for a story, a beginning a middle and an end may be old fashioned but I subscribe to his theory. In this brilliantly directed, acted and filmed effort I was let down by the ending, ie: you are left to imagine it and that is always somewhat disatisfying and I think, in this case, a cop out. Just took the polish off it for me although, to be fair, it really is a very good intelligent film deserving of high recognition.
Posted Friday, 7 September 2012 See my other reviews
says
Don't bother a waste of time dreary and boring
Posted Friday, 10 August 2012 See my other reviews
says
I wonder if I will ever get that 1hr40 of my life back? This movie has cemented itself at the top of my "Worst Movies of 2012" list - not even a list of superb actors could save it.
Posted Monday, 6 August 2012 See my other reviews
Anita L
says
A little bit confused by this one. Slow paced. Watched it twice and still not sure What happened. The changing between the past and present made it hard for me. Had to admit I was curious about Elizabeth Olsen, after having the famous "Olsen twins" as sisters, I wante to know what she was like. If she wasnt in this I wouldnt have bothered. Pretty good performance. Wonder what she'll be In next.
Posted Sunday, 15 July 2012 See my other reviews
Scooby
says
Weird - but good weird.......keep thinking about this movie. Brilliant acting.
Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 See my other reviews
gerd
says
Memorable, more so than a great movie. It's a disturbing story of an emotionally disturbed young woman unable to stop reliving her past and perhaps not wanting to. Much of what happened to her remains dark and mysterious, which becomes frustrating and is a letdown of the movie. As is the unusual ending.
Posted Tuesday, 10 July 2012 See my other reviews
Cairo49
says
Don't know what to say about this one. Really well acted and certainly not a formula movie. I can't relate to the situation at all so that probably affects my overall opinion of the movie. I though the ending was stupid but maybe I just didn't get it. I think people will either love it or consider it a complete waste of time.
Posted Monday, 2 July 2012 See my other reviews
Nomes
says
Much better actress than her sisters! Not a bad film
Posted Wednesday, 27 June 2012 See my other reviews
Cindy
says
Brilliantly crafted and boasting fine performances from all concerned, this is a sombre, understated and quietly unsettling psychological thriller of the highest order.
Posted Wednesday, 27 June 2012 See my other reviews