Cosmopolis (2012)

Cosmopolis
PAY PER PLAY
$5.99 for 48 HOURS
JOIN NOW

Strong sex scenes and violence

Director: David Cronenberg
Actors: Robert Pattinson, Juliette Binoche, Sarah Gadon, Mathieu Amalric, Jay Baruchel, Kevin Durand, Samantha Morton, Paul Giamatti, K'naan, Emily Hampshire, Patricia Mckenzie

Riding across Manhattan in a stretch limo in order to get a haircut, a 28-year-old billionaire asset manager's day devolves into an odyssey with a cast of characters that start to tear his world apart.

DVD
Status: HighDemand
Run time: 108mins
Origin: CANADA
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Play
Run Time: 108mins
File Size (Approx): 1 GB
Safe from penetration
by Simon Miraudo, 3/08/2012 11:00:00 AM

A young genius discovers a series of patterns in the stock market, condenses it to an equation, and capitalises on it. A billionaire by twenty-something, his abilities to predict the world's finances are undone by the smallest, most random of spikes. He had a map for the universe, but he forgot about the people that make it up. He didn't factor in the human element. And that brief synopsis of Cosmopolis does not factor in the David Cronenberg element. Cosmopolis does not follow as linear a path as the first two sentences of this review might imply, but the picture and its protagonist, Eric Packer (Robert Pattinson) do follow a path; one of inevitable decline, populated by occasional, unpredictable, shocking bursts of bloodshed. It's a potent return to (de)form for the Canadian filmmaker, ...

A young genius discovers a series of patterns in the stock market, condenses it to an equation, and capitalises on it. A billionaire by twenty-something, his abilities to predict the world's finances are undone by the smallest, most random of spikes. He had a map for the universe, but he forgot about the people that make it up. He didn't factor in the human element. And that brief synopsis of Cosmopolis does not factor in the David Cronenberg element.

Cosmopolis does not follow as linear a path as the first two sentences of this review might imply, but the picture and its protagonist, Eric Packer (Robert Pattinson) do follow path; one of inevitable decline, populated by occasional, unpredictable, shocking bursts of bloodshed. It's a potent return to (de)form for the Canadian filmmaker, whose most recent effort, A Dangerous Method, lacked the ferocity of classics Crash, Videodrome, and The Fly. The body horror is back here, but so too is the scorching social commentary. Cronenberg's adaptation of Don DeLillo's 2003 novel of the same name is a literal and ultra-logical meander through a crumbling metropolis, in which our hero ignores all the signs and warnings and drives head-first towards destruction. The book relayed the bursting of the dot-com bubble, but we're obviously bringing some more recent baggage to this. Cosmopolis isn't just about the Global Financial Crisis; in its words, and in its actions, and in its execution, it becomes the Global Financial Crisis.

Beginning his day with the single-minded determination to get a haircut, Eric Packer holds court in his technologically-bedecked limousine as it crawls across New York City, with body-man Torval (Kevin Durand) walking beside it all the while. He's visited by employees, lovers, rappers; tormented by a pie-slinging assailant; denied sex by his icy new wife (Sarah Gadon), whom he keeps spotting at various locations. The limo keeps on crawling.

Packer's investment in a foreign currency renders him bankrupt over the course of this endless day. The televised execution of the International Monetary Fund chief and the grammar, syntax, and ill-timed pause by the finance minister during a crucial statement sends the world into chaos. Revolution brews; anarchy erupts; the limo keeps on crawling, despite being targeted and tagged and almost torn-apart. Torval alerts Eric to a legitimate assassination threat. But Eric is on a path; one filled with repeated imagery (of rats; of extreme, grotesque violence), and patterns (of fornication; of stunningly boring meals with his wife), and it's headed downwards, not up. The trend is undeniable.

Pattinson, like Jeff Goldblum, and James Woods, and Viggo Mortensen before him, has one of those perfect Cronenbergian faces. It's as if he's been moulded - shark-like, from the eyes to the jowls - to become the ultimate receptacle for the movie's message. Supporting performers Jay Baruchel, Juliette Binoche, Samantha Morton, Mathieu Amalric, Emily Hampshire, and Patricia McKenzie each pop up for just a moment, so I daren't spoil the role they play in Eric Packer's life. Only Durant (slowly transforming into Christopher Walken) as his security guard and Gadon (wickedly hilarious) as his almost robotic partner appear throughout, and they are welcome presences.

Paul Giamatti is unveiled in the final act as the aforementioned human element. His sequence offers the best clues and keys to interpreting the seemingly impenetrable Cosmopolis, wherein Eric is confronted with the kind of street-urchin his formerly impeccable limousine was supposed to protect him from. But maybe we don't need clues and keys to understand what's going on here. Yes, Cosmopolis is often too talky for its own good; alienating and cynical and mostly unpleasant. However, Giamatti is able to convey some genuine emotion and pain in his scenes, and everything that didn't make sense prior gains clarity through his sheer humanity amidst the film's relentless flurry of cold, calculated, incoherent inhumanity.

3.5/5

Check out Simon's other reviews here.

Read More

Member Reviews (24)

24 Member Reviews
AJ
says
I like difficult arty movies but this was just pretentious and awful. Think of the most convoluted dream you ever had where you are stuck in a car, then write it down in a really quick draft, send it to a movie director stupid enough to make it into a movie and who gets that Twilight vampire actor to star in it (not much range in that face, but very pretty) and you have this pile of dross. I give it 0 but put it as 1 star just so you know I actually watched it.
Posted Sunday, 5 May 2013 See my other reviews
Lee
says
This was a shocker, know what they were going for but it just didn't happen. I wandered away but my other half watched it the end hoping it would get better - it didn't. RP was good though.
Posted Saturday, 20 April 2013 See my other reviews
Tanya
says
This is honestly the worst movie I have seen in my life. Do not bother with it!!
Posted Thursday, 18 April 2013 See my other reviews
Val
says
A difficult movie to understand. I watched it about 5 times with subtitles, to fully get the concept. Not for the faint hearted, nor the prude. What you might expect from a Cronenberg directed movie. Robert Pattinson, the main character, was brilliant
Posted Tuesday, 16 April 2013 See my other reviews
rose
says
I watched it to the end just in case it might get there - ended up painting my toes. Some thought provoking coments in regards to the public demonstrations - then all I could think about was should I paint French Polish or Purple - went French.
Posted Saturday, 13 April 2013 See my other reviews
Karen
says
Totally boring, fell asleep watching it.
Posted Friday, 12 April 2013 See my other reviews
Nick
says
The worst movie we have seen in years, can't believe we even watched it until the end!
Posted Tuesday, 9 April 2013 See my other reviews
Colin
says
I'm picking this movie was some sort of biting social commentary on global economics and how capitalism has dehumanised our industry leaders and all the social injustice that goes with it ... but really I'm far too shallow to pick up on any of this. So I was really bored, couldn't be bothered investing any effort trying to understand the movie and ended up wanted those 2 hours back.
Posted Saturday, 6 April 2013 See my other reviews
Autumn Sadie
says
Could this be THAT BAD? ...Yes, yes it can. I'm also embarrassed to put my name to this. Most of the film is set in the limo, complete with green screen window-shots, vague characters, and Pattison pasty white with sunglasses on. His acting (if you can call it that) is dismal, the supporting characters struggle with the script, it is completely lacking believability, the continuity is scattered... where was the director? Was there even a director? B-grade films are better. Seriously. No stars deserving, but I give them 1 purely for the effort of filmmaking, and for the gaffer.
Posted Thursday, 4 April 2013 See my other reviews
says
Absolute rubbish! The most pretentious, self indulgent piece of drivel I have ever seen. Do not waste your time.
Posted Friday, 15 March 2013 See my other reviews
says
they wanted to make this a cult but it went wrong, too much to take with no real bang, would not recommend at all. An interesting cast that don't save the movie.
Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 See my other reviews
says
Worst movie I've ever seen.
Posted Wednesday, 20 February 2013 See my other reviews
says
?
Posted Tuesday, 19 February 2013 See my other reviews
Bored out of my brain
says
Rather boring I must say. What a pile of steaming rubbish.
Posted Saturday, 9 February 2013 See my other reviews
says
Pretentious rubbish. Could easily be one of those movies you are forced to study at high school that make no sense. If you want a good movie don’t hire this one!!! Also, it has the worst in car ‘blue screen’ effects I’ve ever seen, made it very hard to take seriously.
Posted Thursday, 24 January 2013 See my other reviews
Michelle
says
This movie may not be every one's cup of coffee however.... We enjoyed it because we see today's society is just like the movie.. it is deep so many people may simply not get it! They want action.. no.. they want dialogue and fast plot.. no.. But if you want a movie that challenges your sensibilities and makes you think and a bit of theatre and art house then this may be for you.. Strange and slow but thought provoking none the less..
Posted Tuesday, 22 January 2013 See my other reviews
says
Ditto what the other members say ... THUMBS DOWN!
Posted Saturday, 19 January 2013 See my other reviews
says
should have read the reviews before I queued it. lasted about 15 minutes into the movie. appallingly bad. looks like it was made on $15,000 budget.
Posted Thursday, 17 January 2013 See my other reviews
says
Boring! All dialogue, no substance.
Posted Wednesday, 9 January 2013 See my other reviews
says
bad
Posted Tuesday, 8 January 2013 See my other reviews
says
Very disappointing movie, what a waste of time. I could not even get through it
Posted Monday, 7 January 2013 See my other reviews
says
DON'T BOTHER WASTING YOUR TIME WATCHING THIS PILE OF SHITE, ITS TOTALLY POINTLESS, I FEEL LIKE IVE HAD NEARLY 1.5 HOURS STOLEN FROM MY LIFE WATCHING THIS DRIVEL !
Posted Sunday, 30 December 2012 See my other reviews
nomes
says
I must have missed something...didn't get it, couldn't get into it
Posted Thursday, 27 December 2012 See my other reviews
Johnson
says
Pompous rubbish. Like watching your grandfather rap at your birthday party -- it tries to be cool, but comes across as try-hard and pathetic. All of the actors struggle with the material, particularly Pattinson, whose performance highlights his failings (this may well be another nail in the coffin of his acting career). Cronenberg has at times created some brilliant movies -- "The Fly" is a classic -- but the utter stupidity of this film is simply embarrassing.
Posted Saturday, 22 December 2012 See my other reviews